iStock Price Increases

Posted on 1/20/2011 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (2)

iStockphoto has introduced its new round of price increases for 2011. For those in the macro world (RM and traditional RF) who like to argue that it is impossible to make money selling images on a microstock site it may be time to take another look at what iStock is doing.

Currently the company has 5 different collections at different price points.
 
  Non-Exc. Exclusive Exclusive+ Vetta Agency
XS 1 2 5    
S 3 5 10 30 55
M 7 10 20 50 75
L 10 15 30 70 100
XL 15 20 35 100 150
XXL 20 25 40 125 200
XXXL 25 30 50 150 250



A few things are worth noting. They have kept the number of credits required to purchase an images in their main, non-exclusive collection the same as in 2010 with the single exception of raising the credits required to purchase the medium size file from 6 to 7. This would tend to indicate that they feel they have reached the maximum of what the small user is willing pay for images.

While they don’t want to chase the small users away, there are indications from the blogs where some photographers report their sales results that many customers have been leaving iStock and finding the images they need on Shutterstock, Dreamstime and Fotolia. Images licensed by iStock in 2010 were probably down compared to the number licensed in 2009. Nevertheless, iStock still probably licensed rights to in excess of 22 million images in 2010 while Getty-Images was probably lucky if it licensed rights to 1.5 million from its Creative collection and Alamy probably licensed something in the range of 200,000.

To deal with its problem of fewer sales, and still keep their gross margin strong, iStock has cut the percentage of gross revenue they pay out to non-exclusive photographers as a royalty. So yes, those in the macro world may be right when talking about images in iStock’s non-exclusive collection.



On the other hand, iStock is definitely putting much more emphasis on selling to the professional users who can afford to pay more for the images they need. The prices on the other collections are quite different from the non-exclusive collection. In particular the company has raised the prices on Exclusive + quite a bit.

File 2010 2011
Size E+ E+
XS 5 5
S 10 10
M 15 20
L 20 30
XL 25 35
XXL 30 40
XXXL 35 50

When photographers move their images from non-exclusive, to exclusive, to exclusive+ in order to get higher prices they tend to see a rapid fall off in the number of sales they make. At the higher prices many of microstock’s traditional customers can no longer afford to use the images, regardless of how great they might be. After seeing the new prices for Exclusive+ a significant number of photographers who have risen through the microstock ranks have indicated that they want to move their images back to the lower priced Exclusive category. Evidently these photographers are convinced that the higher price per unit licensed will not make up for the loss in number of sales.



On the other hand, photographers from the macro world now find the premium collections much more reasonably priced. While the prices may not be as high as traditional royalty free, these photographers believe they are likely to make more sales than if their images were licensed through non-microstock sites. This seems likely to happen because currently a larger percentage of the total customer base tends to use the microstock sites, rather than the traditionally priced sites, to search for the images they need. The photographers with images in the higher priced brands may also benefit from better positions in the search return order.

One photographer with images in all four of iStock’s premium collections and experience in both the traditional RF and microstock markets earned in excess of $400,000 in 2010 and an average of $8.60 per image downloaded.

Another thing to consider is that the credits are not really the price. Most credits cost more than $1.00.

iStockphoto Credit Prices    
Credits Price $/Credit
12 $18.50 $1.54
26 $39.50 $1.52
50 $75.00 $1.50
120 $175.00 $1.46
300 $430.00 $1.43
600 $800.00 $1.33
1,000 $1,250.00 $1.25
2,000 $2,250.00 $1.12
5,000 $5,250.00 $1.05
10,000 $10,000.00 $1.00
20,000 $20,000.00 $0.95

If someone wants to purchase one XXXL file from the Agency collection they would have to purchase at least 300 credits and the image would actually cost them $357.50. Sure, if they were a big user and wanted to purchase 20,000 credits they could get the image for a little less than $250.00. But there aren’t going to be many customers whose image usage requirements are such that they can justify purchasing that many credits at one time.

Even those photographers who are adamantly opposed to licensing images through microstock sites need to be aware of these trends. There is every reason to believe that we will see more pricing segmentation of various collections at iStock in the future.


Copyright © 2011 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-461-7627, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Jim Pickerell is founder of www.selling-stock.com, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to: http://www.jimpickerell.com/Curriculum-Vitae.aspx.  

Comments

  • Gildo nicolo Spadoni Posted Jan 20, 2011
    oh goody, now i can eat solid white instead of chunk light tuna fish.

  • Paul Melcher Posted Jan 20, 2011
    That just proves that microstock has made an error and was underpriced: If someone is ready to purchase an images for $1, they can easily purchase the same image for $5.
    Sure, Istock might loose some sales to resilient bottom feeders but it will be insignificant. As far as seeing photographers making bigger commission : doubtful. This market segment is typical of a long tail. It grows horizontally, not vertically.

Post Comment

Please log in or create an account to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive email notification when new stories are posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Stock Photo Pricing: The Future
In the last two years I have written a lot about stock photo pricing and its downward slide. If you have time over the holidays you may want to review some of these stories as you plan your strategy ...
Read More
Future Of Stock Photography
If you’re a photographer that counts on the licensing of stock images to provide a portion of your annual income the following are a few stories you should read. In the past decade stock photography ...
Read More
Blockchain Stories
The opening session at this year’s CEPIC Congress in Berlin on May 30, 2018 is entitled “Can Blockchain be applied to the Photo Industry?” For those who would like to know more about the existing blo...
Read More
2017 Stories Worth Reviewing
The following are links to some 2017 and early 2018 stories that might be worth reviewing as we move into the new year.
Read More
Stories Related To Stock Photo Pricing
The following are links to stories that deal with stock photo pricing trends. Probably the biggest problem the industry has faced in recent years has been the steady decline in prices for the use of ...
Read More
Stock Photo Prices: The Future
This story is FREE. Feel free to pass it along to anyone interested in licensing their work as stock photography. On October 23rd at the DMLA 2017 Conference in New York there will be a panel discuss...
Read More
Important Stock Photo Industry Issues
Here are links to recent stories that deal with three major issues for the stock photo industry – Revenue Growth Potential, Setting Bottom Line On Pricing and Future Production Sources.
Read More
Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More

More from Free Stuff